International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Pago 3. - - - London C.D

The Bulletin Vol. 2, No. 12, 23 March 1963 · p. 5 of the scan · 191 words

The scan: tb-v02n12-23-mar-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.61).

DaFsance From a South Londom Correspondent 1506 On Saturday, the London Civil Defence Region organized a special elected members course at the Guildhall Livery Hall. The object: of the exercise was to convince councillors in the Greater London area that Civil Defence was a practical proposition, High powered speakers ranging from A.C.W. Drew, the Civil Defence chief of the Home Office, to D, Seott-Wilson, M.B.E., A.R.I.C., (regional training officer) attempted to convince an assortment of Labour and Conservative councillors that effective preparations had in fact been made to "protect Britain from a muclear attack",

There were at least 300 delogatos to this conference , and tho time alloweq for discussion was sufficient for a number of pointed quost— ions to be asked which punctured the balloon of deception and self docoption that has besn woven around the Civil Defence recruiting campaign.

The principal line persued by the more vocal critics of Civil Deferico was that :--1. the name Civil Defence is a misnomer, it should be Civil Reseus oor Civil Emergency Corps, and-

2. that the basic concept of Civil .- Defence was am elaborate deception perpotuated om a gillible public,

← Y.S. National committee membors walks outProgram Governlient Axes I.c.c. School Building →

Something wrong on this page?