International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Chinese Communist Party Exposes Nehru's "socialism",

The Bulletin Vol. 2, No. 14, 6 April 1963 · p. 7 of the scan · 202 words

The scan: tb-v02n014-6-apr-1963.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

Special Correspondent.

The April lst issue of “Red Flag", tha fortnightly theoretical journal of the Contral Committeo Pine Ceulet Party of China, featured an article entitled "What kind of stuff is Nehru's much advertised 'socialism! ?" The article makes a critical analysis and exposure, in the light of a woalth of facts, of the “socialism” that is sometimes attrituted to Nehru. The article consists of three parts, the first being an analysis of what Nehru terms economic planning, the second part shows how the economic planning only benefits the exploiters and foreign monopolies, and the third deals with the so-called “socialist pattern of society" in India.

The article includes a violent attack on the Jugoslav CP for its defence of Nehru's sogialiam : " In recent years, however, the Yugoslav Tito group of revisionists - renegades to Marxism—Leniniam — have asserted timo and time again that the method of national economic planningis being ever more widely applied under capitalism and has become an important requisite for the 'peaceful transition! from capitalism to socialism, They have ovon used India's execution of an 'economic construction plan! and other things to support their claim that India is realising its goal of socialism", tho article says,

← Crisis in Soviet Leadership 7"aid to Algeria" Committer Formed in Hritain, →

Something wrong on this page?