International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

Russell on Mexican witch-hunt

The Week Vol. 8, No. 7, c. 16 August 1967 · p. 15 of the scan · 189 words

The scan: The Week v8 no7.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the issue's contents list (match 0.80).

Mexico's enduring resistance to foreign domination is unique in the western hemisphere, The names of Padre Hidalgo, Benito Juarez, Emiliano Zapata and Lazaro Cardenas inspire profound feelings in all Latin Americans who aspire to national independence and the rectification of social injustice. With its long history of self-determination and civil liberty, Mexico should continue to set an example for all the Americans, The recent arrest and imprisonment of Daniel Camejo Guanche and thirteen others seems to contravene Mexico's long established traditions. These men should not be persecuted for holding unorthodox political views. The charges brought against them should be examined scrupulously and impartially by an independent international commission. This commission should also investigate the defendants' countercharges of abusive treatment and the coercion of forced confessions, In the meantime all the defendants should have the elementary right to be set free on payment of a reasonable sum as bail, In those countries where the United States exercises its hegemony, political dissent is seldom tolerated, Latin America has become a continent of political prisoners, Mexico should not betray its own best traditions by conforming to this grim pattern.

2nd August 1967

← Speech to 0.l.a.s[Untitled, contents page] →

Something wrong on this page?