International Marxist Group Archive

Magazines, bulletins and booklets of the IMG and its forerunners, 1961–1984

The Politics of Abstention

· The Week Vol. 9, No. 4, c. 24 January 1968 · p. 7 of the scan · 550 words

The scan: The Week v9 no4.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Tesseract OCR) from a scan of a stencilled typescript and has not been corrected. Expect misread words; titles in particular are often garbled where the issue printed no contents list. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: capitals heading; heuristic; title from the OCR of the heading.

One Labour M.P. yit done less harm Ry aca ae Sh thoee whe abstetned:have probebly

now sc

I would also add those who voted for Aig ered biped, "ta these aather,

The main excuses sagt mi an be oar group would be that most of Wilson's sak Sie acne CF 3 ° wh take instructions from the international bankers excuses are a load oye o implicitly accept his case, is that these , of sived cockcoy Shit nonsense, They are derived from a basic acSeptance scale wie 2 my philosophy, together with the dictum that Labour

m rom the workers in time of crisis than the Tories. =

Hu

olds dear, and possibley h

y have an eff oréie hee He went on to say "that the formation of such i aie Pan Mey “ a a ie yen dcinagier election and the collapse of the

erent po cal force. It would be, in fact

of despair. I therefore reject it unless it proves thuvetaabIe.”” Aalgiie

This last point seems to have been written completely i ori : i > A ses

— and apathy shown in the CLPs and the bey: sheets ceniiy. “tt aay

clear that if one believed that Wilson was trying his hardest to steer towards socialist policies and only Heath and Zurich Gnomes were stopping him, that a vote of confidence should obviously be given to him. |

The abstentions on Thursday have put the Government in a quandary. The measures Silkin put forward were obviously desipned to crush the abstaining M.P.s, but they also provided a very useful opportunity for the left M.P.s to t¥m round and fight to form a viable opposition rroup, recornisahle as such, within the Parliamentary Labour Party. Every abstaining M.P. must feel the ineffectiveness of their action. It is certainly difficult to see any concrete outcome from therm. This has mee’ that taken with Wilson's "gall to the nation", their opposition has borne no fruit at all. While it/certain that deep-seated loyalty of the labour movement exists, it is also true that there is a lot of reneral discontent and, more particular, lots come from the hardened backbone of the working class, who can see through Wilson and the T.4.C. leadership, end yet who have no viable alternativeto which to give their support. It is this chance that Silkin has now given to the left M.P.s, those who abstained and those whodién't ut who are known to oppose Wilson's policicigs. Wilson's eat of calling a General Election makes very little sense; he surely does not jhink that the Tories would vote for him because of his attacks on the workers. Even if this were the case, it would be even more important that opposition to Wilson should be clarified. around a prorramme and that a useful number of M.P.s be able to put it across at every opport— unity up and down the country. But it is. because the next general election holds very little hope and because the Labour support is collapsing that. some-one needs to ret up and say "Nol, this is not what Labour stends for!" If this is done in @ loud and clear way, after 3hyears of Wilsonism it may be that the electorate will give the Labour Party another chance in 3% years.

← Student Vietnam Confer NceThe Final Rally in Brighton →

Something wrong on this page?