or tw
an whieh lng m5 inJlapencent siprifiennes.
se
oe |
nab |
7 mets Sa ate ee
in these throes roapsetive
ering t3 thor.
ua whully polsibla
tween the wirkera uml tew
Prriniee.?
rime oO
The Cirviunists, cs hos been aid, mst not opsase such octivne but 2m the cintr-ory “ust Also assume the initirctive for thea, precisely for the recaon thot the grenter is the Heeea Orewn int) the ravuoant, the higher ite self-conficonesa rises, oll the wore gealf-ce mfitent will thet tings oivenent be en] cll the aire resolutely will it be enpoble of nirching farw-r', hawever 0o"est o-y be the initinl sloganco sf atruggle. inl this uesnus thet the growth of the tras aspects 2f tha oovenent tends to roldieslisd 4t, ant crentes ouch usre frvorsble cin titions for the slogmns, (i¢thaca of strugrle, nu., in generrl, the lacing role Mf the Catemnist Party. The refirsists frond the revilutionecry potentiol of the mass mare= nent; thoir belsvel -rena is tho parlisnentary tribune, the tr:ce-union burccus, the crbitrcetion bocrcs, the scinistericl rote=chriibors. On the contrary, we sre, cport fron oll other consiterctisns, intereste! in Urcering the reforoists fraa their osyliutia bne plecing then nisnesivte surselves* before the eyes af the otriuggling actaes. th os correct teotic we ston” anly ts goin from this. Carminist whs ‘.ub@ or fears this resecbles « awitier whs hes approve’ the theses on tho best néthst of swisning tut "1res not plunge ints the woter, 6. Unity of front consequently curesupposes our recciness, within certhin Jiiwite pnt on snacifia issuce, t5 tarraolote in prectioa cur setiongs with thooe of refaritiat sorgenigatiine, ta the extent ts which the Ilstter 6til1 expross teicy the will sf important csectiona >f tho -aibettled Vitleterirt. But citer ol, uldn"t we split with then? Tose, beetcuga we JLeagpree wity then on fun ’osenteal questions of the working-clias invenant., ind Yet we seok agreciicnt with thet Yoo, ih «cll thiso ersat where the ingaes thot follaw then cre renty ti engage in joint strugche topether with the tisesce thet fallow us coo when they, the peforiiste, miata a Lesser aor fraecter Ceres eonpelle. ti becsne on dnatrugont of thia struggle: Hut wan't they avy that eiter splitting with thoi, te -etill teat thes Tos, ‘their blirbborssiths wey ony this, Bere-cnd thers sateboly an our Wn Frnke ony teko Pright =f it... But sa -ragaria the brusc wirking oassce = even those who ‘1 nat Pillow us sas who'ts got re yet understonc aur foile Dut wha (3 ses two af thres-l-abour orennizatisns leading 2 pernllel axistente = these iinsses will Crow fran our con‘ugt this esnelusian, that tespite the elit we ora osine overthing in our power ta freklitete unity in setiin for thé “eee. ve . policy cine=® ta secure the unite? frint isco not of esureo contain ruteactotic sucrenteas that unity in cetisn will ceturlly be -ttadinec in nll inestenoes, On'the cintrery, “tn oony tc608 onl. pork: pe evan the Hojority of cnpes, srganientisocl reraanents will be only Helferttrined oF Peronpes nat «ft oll, But dti-da necesocry thet the -otrupeling oneees Ghoul? olweyas be given the opportunity af canvinbing the:mselvea that the non=cehleverient of unity in setisn wes not “we t sur foriclictic irracancilobility but tsa the lrek af ranl will ta atruggle: sn the port sf tha reforcists.
In entering int»: ogroetients with other orgoiizationa, we noturrclly sbligcte ourselves ta = certcin (iscipline in setion. But this Mecipline cannozt be -beolute in cheracter, In the avent thet the refornicts begin putting brekes on the struggle to the obvious ‘etrinent of the tavenent =n’ cet evunter t: the asitusticn an’ the 139.25 °f the iniges, we ce cn in‘apenJent orgmninntion clwoys reserve the right ts i les® the strugple to the end, an’ this without our teopornry seni-clilea * This acy give rise to a new sharpening 3f the a4trugele between us ant the reforcists. But it will na longer involve s. sinple repetition sf one =n the ecce set 3f a"ens within nr shut-in circle but will signifyprovide: aur toctic ic ¢arrest = the extension of sur influence sver new, fresh prsoups of the prolcterict, &. It is voseible to see in this molicy 7 fropra chescat with the reforaista only frov the stencpoint of c journlist whi beifeves thot he rides himself of refarsisoa by rituclistic-lly criticising 1¢ without over lenving his e@itarisl office but who ia fesrful of cl ashing with the refortists before the eyo of the working uraees oan giving the lstter an spportunity to nc-uriise the Counmist cnt the reforoiet on the eaurl plnne of the ‘nes strugrle. Bechin:! this acciing revolutionary ferr of ‘eanprocehenent™ there really lurks - politic:1 prssivity which aeeks % perpetucte on urlor of things whersin the Couunista sn. rofirnlats enoh rotcin their own Pisialy “Ceccrente:| spheres of influents, their om fuciences ot neetings, their swum press, cnc oll thie together crantea @m 1itei-om of serie salitiesl strugele, 9. Wa broke with the reforciste «nc centrists in orcer ts abtein conplete fresdon in criticizing perfity, betr-y.1, in‘véision onc the brifwhy sprit in tha lebouwr novenent, For this resasn ony sart If ursaniec= tidnsl ogreevent which restricte our freec a: af criticion sno mgiteticn is “baolutely unneceptrble to uc. We porticla:te in « unttel front but lo-mot for ui single cioment become “dasctlvyet in it. We Tunction in the united front =s oh in’ enenZtent Soteshetent. It is nreeisely in the course 3fstreegle thet bron a-sses oust Tecra fron exporicnee that we fight better then the others, th-t-we gee nore cleurly thin the gthers, tant we apg dare rudcedonue nn) recolutes In thie wey, we sirll bring closer She houp of the unite? revolutionary front unfor the unJispute: Oa wanist léenlership.